they normally sit there since most of the hardcore wants the high end, but they are only available online while the Series S sits there because it is mostly for the newcomer to Xbox or for families that like the price and is availible in stores.
If I get the opportunity again, I might just pick up a Series S for a portable emulator thank to MVG’s video.
Hooking up my older consoles to a modern OLED is a pain
2 Likes
For series S I saw 2 in the local walmart and im in the subbubs of chicago. The next day they were gone. I have not seen them anywhere else but when I wanted one getting it from costco online was pretty easy. they had them for like a week it looked like. I have yet to see a ps5 or series x anywhere in a store. I got my series x at launch from amazon and my ps from sony direct. I always check stores when I go out of curiosity
Yeah I kind of stumbled my way into getting a Series X at launch.
It’s crazy to think it might be until 2023 where you could just walk into a store and buy one. Same with the PS5 probably.
1 Like
ya I feel like we are going to have a longer generation because of it. until people can just walk into the stores to get the consoles when they want at least. I can see this gen being 10 years. luckly these consoles arn’t under powered like last gen
9 Likes
Who said Game Pass kill—
Ah forget it…
1 Like
I see some forum warriors still echoing “game pass is heavily subsidized” despite the multiple public statements made by those in the know.
This is just the players in the Hall of Fame, isn’t it? And that’s the players who have to complete a significant portion of campaign, not nearly everyone who plays gets it.
1 Like
what do they mean by this?
Yeah, it is either illegal, not profitable or will kill gaming with these people. I bet that will change when PlayStation does something similar… total coincidence!
[size=0]Disclaimer: This post may contain one or more of the following: sarcasm, jokes, tounge-in-cheek comments, attempts at humour, lightheartedness and/or silliness. If you feel offended, please contact your local DB rep. Here is a link on humour for those unfamiliar with the concept: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humour[/size]
1 Like
Lol what’s up with that weird disclaimer on all your posts
They usually say how it’s an impossible business model to sustain and how it can never make enough money to break even and that it only exists because Microsoft is dumping in billions from other divisions to run it. They will always ignore counter-points presented from those who would know like Satya Nadella, Phil Spencer, Sarah Bond, or Aaron Greenberg.
It wont be until Sony has a like-for-like competitor offering that it will somehow magically become a sustainable business model. But only for Sony. Not for Microsoft.
It’s best to simply roll your eyes at them, ignore their post, and move onto something more worthy of spending your time.
4 Likes
I thought the French surrender flag was pure White…
4 Likes
On the contrary, if BGS goes into a Starfield - TES cycle I’d be happy.
I don’t want to wait until the mid 2030’s to play a Starfield sequel.
1 Like
I’d be interested in a new Fallout outside of BGS.
Like if inXile or Obsidian was given Fallout New Seattle or something, then I’d gladly play that.
But I get BGS doesn’t want to hand over Fallout to anyone other than BGS, WHICH IS WEIRD BECAUSE Obsidian made NV which is the best Fallout, and Obisidan and BGS have the checks signed by the same comapny now.
3 Likes
They have pride and want to see the next Fallout be their own, probably as a “make good” after Fallout 76.
1 Like
Even more weird that Bethesda tried to screw over Obsidian with bonus checks on NV so they could actively try to acquire them.
I’ll continue to beat the drum that BGS needs to expand or give the Fallout IP to BGS Austin. They can’t have their franchises on a decade plus release cycle.
5 Likes
Is Austin a support studio or they made 76?