Microsoft-Activision-Blizzard Discussion Thread (Part 1)

Thing is, they should not even have to question anything related to COD. If Microsoft wants, when they own Activision they can go and straight up cancell COD forever, its their product.
I dont see this people forcing Adobe to not put stuff into subscriptions or go to Apple and force them to put their apps on the PS,Google,etc stores.

They literally do not know how to do their jobs, its astonishing really. Their job is not to asure COD will or wont be on a Playstation, its to protect competition and consumers first, taking COD of playstation does not hurt Playstation a single bit… Like the worst thing about this, is that they’re taking this as a joke when its just pure incompetence at this point.

3 Likes

If the big concession is keeping CoD on all platforms, that’s a huge win for Microsoft. Microsoft was never going to make CoD exclusive, it just makes no sense to not continue to grow such a prestigious brand. It wouldn’t be wise to leave a CoD sized vacuum on the PlayStation platform. Microsoft has many more ways to leverage this acquisition for the Xbox brand that doesn’t require CoD exclusivity.

1 Like

Adobe situation is fascinating to be honest. Like … how big is its market share at this point? And Adobe continues to purchase various companies…

1 Like

They literally kill the entire competition by purchasing them, adding them to their sub and then closing them down. That company is who they need to investigate and force them to make concession, not microsoft or even Playstation.

2 Likes

Concessions to whom though? All other competitors of Adobe died long time ago :joy:

Stuff like not being able to make everything subscription based, or not be able to shut down those services in X amount of years. Or straight up blocking the purchase, wich they did with META and I think they also did with Nvidia and ARM

If the only concession is for COD to be on PS, im sure Microsoft would be 100% good with that as long as they can still include it in Game Pass which I don’t believe would be negotiable on Microsoft’s side and doesn’t include the restriction of COD becoming a platform like Sea of Thieves where there’s the base game and content gets added to it throughout the months and years.

ARM situation was special, however the truth is that Adobe benefits from being B2B facing application mainly. Not consumer facing like social networks, ads, search…

Kinda weird for a regulator to say that publicly… also even weirder that the only focus is the franchise that Sony has been crying about, like try to be more transparent man, at least say “all ABK games” and not just COD, we know Sony doesn’t give a damn about the others for obvious reasons but still, it makes this whole sound like it’s about Sony’s interests and not protecting gamers.

4 Likes

To care about other ABK games you need to play on PC or mobile, but most of players in europe (and I guess he is from Portugal) play on consoles and it is usually Playstation so it leaves either COD or Overwatch. They we can consider him a general consumer and thus he is more likely to play COD.

Geez, that seems like a massive bias and conflict of interest. He should be removed from any involvement in the case or ruling immediately.

3 Likes

Lol.

That’s the power of mindshare in the EU.

They don’t even refer it as the “next gen consoles” there, they just say PS5.

4 Likes

Statement from Phil next week:

“Microsoft is committed to bringing Call of Duty to Ricardos Playstation.”

9 Likes

ABK deal has turned into a comedy at this point :joy:

He should ask Sony to put a browser on Playstation :joy:

3 Likes

Any ideas if that post stating the FTC will vote on December/ January has any legitimate sources or just nonsense ?

Well, we knew about late November but that’s basically it. Capitol etc. seems to be some business account or something. So maybe it is a true.

8 Likes

Dude will wake up to a lot of notifications :joy:

1 Like