Microsoft-Activision-Blizzard Discussion Thread (Part 1)

It might be. Microsoft would lose a ton doing that.

So you think they are going to bring every single first party game to GP Day 1 but not CoD?

Guess Starfield and ES6 will no longer be Day 1 on GP :frowning:

3 Likes

But they won’t free it, we all know that. Maybe some ip will be freed and given to other studios but Xbox will keep the CoD train running.

I could see that for sure. The day 1 sales for cod is too high for them to change it. CoD is its own beast. Maybe the single player will be free but multiplayer paid.

Lol, you are on a record for most bad takes in a week span.

14 Likes

:rofl: Agreed :rofl:

1 Like

Y’all keep saying that but haven’t brought up anything in the contrary.

Lets ignore how absolutely terrible that would look for MS, Xbox and GP and the fact it goes against everything in their GP and gaming strategy

But CoD as much money as it makes from retail sales, makes shit ton from DLC/MTX, the more people they can get playing CoD Day 1 on xbox/GP the more people they will reach potentially spending money on MTX and making their money back that way

CoD day 1 on GP will mean less sales on Xbox absolutely but it also means more subscriptions to GP and more MTX sold

Can’t believe you’re even entertaining this idea, it’s the same logic people were using for not bringing Starfield/ES/Bethesda games to Playstation, MS couldn’t possibly take that loss

It’s utter nonsense

6 Likes

Sorry, but…

1 Like

CoD is an entirely different beast though. If CoD was Xbox exclusive then I could see it as it would drive Series S and Gamepass subscriptions but if it’s going to be multiplatform, you aren’t going to gain a ton new subscribers that way as the yearly CoD guys will keep purchasing but then you will be losing the sales from the Xbox guys who already have gamepass

What an absolute take. Microsoft will put CoD on gamepass purely from what it will do for gamepass.

So it looks like the purchase is getting increasingly harder to close?

Not necessarily - this is a reason why MS said they expect to get this deal closed in fiscal year 2023 (which ends on June 30, 2023).

Nothing has changed

The EU said by March 1st I believe is their final verdict so if they say “you can’t do it” Then that could push it past that. Or if they require provisions or something like “have to sell off this part of the company etc”

I could see fall/winter being when Xbox starts talking about any plans or Gamepass drops for the ABK title as it will take a few months to get everything rolling.

That was the CMA.

2 Likes

Short recap? I don’t have time to watch.

1 Like

All the Phase 2 escalations are all expect and nothing to worry about pretty much, EU have highlighted concerns to Microsoft which is what they need to start phase 2 deeper looks. Microsoft didn’t give any remedies because they would be doing it prematurely and they will want hard reasonings why they came to the conclusion.

My thoughts/understanding , going phase 2 means the EU has to give parties reasons and conclusions on why they think it won’t be good and have to back it up with the extra data they collect in phase 2. They will then give MS time to come up with remedies and so on to make them happy.

My opinion, pretty much this was always going to happen regardless and not some big unexpected deal that could cause trouble.

15 Likes

Thanks. I agree with your assessment.