If Microsoft thinks that the CMA is going to be a road block for every future acquisition based on a precedent that developers that Microsoft acquires have to be included in their competitors service, thereâs a strong possibility that Microsoft would pull their gaming business out of the UK. Microsoft clearly has long term plans with their gaming and if itâs determined that they can they have a better chance of achieving their goals by avoiding the UK as constant roadblock, theyâd make the move for whatâs in the best interest of their business. The fact that the CMA basically has unchecked power with M&A is problematic when they seem to be radical and less interested in data based analysis. Weâll see how this moves forward, but itâs quite alarming.
That would be incredibly spiteful for Microsoft to stop doing business in the UK over this deal. Remember the UK government right now is pretty bad, things will turn around in 5 years and Microsoft doesnât want to poison the well with whoever is running CMA then.
It wouldnât be Microsoft wanting to do so, their hands would be tied. Either let them compete or make continuous hypothetical arguments about why Microsoft canât acquire companies. Saying craziness like contracts donât matter and such shows that they arenât dealing with a rational regulatory body. At some point, you have to think about whatâs in the best interest of your future business.
Yeah, exactly this. In this hypothetical where the CMA continues their Phase 1 arguments and does not make rational decisions based on sound legal basis and legitimate data (not heresay, made up information or falsifying markets like excluding Nintendo from the console market). Microsoft has to protect their business. In fact they have a fiduciary responsibility to the shareholders to do so.
Unfortunately, that would mean either continuing business in the UK and being annually fined 5% of their total global turnover (thats their law, Iâm not familiar withe the term so I dont know how much that is) or they stop doing business in the UK.
I cant imagine that the people in the country would be thrilled with the CMA if they stopped getting Microsoft products and software support. That wouldnt bode well for the people at the CMA as they and politicians would be the ones drawing the ire of the people. I mean just imagine for a minute, no windows support, no security updates, no Microsoft office, no Teams or Skype, no Azure, no SQL Server support or patches, no Microaoft Gaming. I have to imagine there would be changes quickly to the CMA and the UK begging Microsoft to come back.
With that being said I think that the CMA will play hardball but accept concessions and move to pass the deal. I cant imagine they continue these absurd arguments or conplete lack of detail. I will also note that in the past two years the CMA has been fined more than 40 million and their total budget each year is only 100 million, which is not much. It could be that the entire CMA is wholly unequipped to even vet an acquisition like this. The FTC for instance talks about how underfunded they are and they receive a shade under 400 million per year.
Imagine CMA forcing CoD on PS+ day and date⌠On a service where Sony doesnât put there own games day and date.
It will be a decision of a monarch at that point⌠Not someone who is thinking about competitiveness.
Xbox is trying to provide the biggest game in the console industry at cheap price to mass consumers via gamepass and CMA is trying to stop it from happening.
These are sad events for gamers.
Hopefully the regulators in Phase 2 use actual common sense here because this has been a joke so far and whatâs even worse is how much power the CMA has with very little oversight. (Also I kinda donât like that a UK agency can stop an American company from acquiring another American company).
And yeah I know this deal getting blocked would affect a lot of people negatively, myself included, while the ones doing anti consumer practices get rewarded, I think Iâd try my best to never spend another dollar on any Sony brand if this gets blocked, yeah theyâre not the ones blocking it but they sure as hell seem to have influenced some of the regulators with their constant bitchinâ so why support a company that is constantly trying to make my experience on Xbox worseâŚ?
Some say look at the big picture? And commented without emotions! The situation became provocative. Their hypocrisy reached the sky. I wish Microsoft slap r Street Fighter 5 and confine it to only one device in seven years in their faces , and it is considered the mother of fighting games plus withdrawing Spider-Man legacy games from stores. Yes CMA is corrupt and Jim Ryan has a secret hand in the matter
No, of course not. If Satya is unhappy itâll be at regulators.
You really need to stop posting. You donât seem to understand what youâre talking about.
You mean itâs not customary for the head of Xbox to perform seppuku if the deal falls through?
Well played lol
No joke I got my first white hair about a month ago lol. Damn acquisitions turning me grey before my time
After the week weâve just had letâs hope for more positive news next week. By positive I mean a competent regulator speaks.
This isnât 2014 where Phil had to convince MS to buy Minecraft, MS and Satya are all in on gaming now
If they are spending 70b on ABK itâs because Satya wants it
We will have that fun ride every week probably
I do wonder what Satya is gonna do considering that Sony is trying to mess with their money.
What if only UK blocks deal would that mean Microsoft would have to stop business there or does it mean in the UK they canât have ABK games on gamepass? Also lets say only UK blocks it would be possible just to have a shell company publish games in the UK. Anyways, this whole thing is crazy how it seems CMA might be anti sub service when Sony themselves block games from going to gamepass in the past.
I donât know if weâll hear anything till most of these regulators make an actual decision and that could take a while for some of them. The big difference here seems to be that the CMA seems to want to make this whole thing very very public compared to everyone else.
Thats not really true. CADE was as public as it gets. They literally was copies of every single submittal from every company they spoke to available online for the public to view. A few things were blacked out but thats it.
Well CADE did not use Twitter I think.