Got to admit, I am kind of digging Sony themselves throwing cold water on the narrative that the hardcore fans have built up over the years lol.
7 Likes
Itâs an old term brought into the gaming space. And it doesnât make any sense in gaming.
This is what banger refers to:
Anyways the weird thing about Sony potentially buying Take Two is that theyâve created a situation where GTA, RDR, and their sports games have to be multi-platform. For at least 10 years for the first 2.
Plus if MS aggressively pursues long-term marketing rights for GTA, itâll nullify any benefit of a purchase.
All hypothetical, I think Sony would pursue other high value targets first. CD Projekt Red, Square, etc.
2 Likes
Was watching Xbox Two and Jez always has the worst takes when it comes to exclusivity. Dude thinks the Blizzard Survival game would be multiplatform even if its announced after the acquisition, despite MS canning PS5 version of Redfall
This is the same guy who thinks that if Killer Instinct comes back it needs to be on Playstation and that Microsoft should promise to make Diablo and Crash multiplat forever
Dude is 100% delusional and has terrible takes
1 Like
Redfall was multiple years way from completion when they completed development, his point with this survival game is that it is reportedly so close to being finished that it might not make sense to cancel a near finished PS5 version 
Seems reasonable to me, he even acknowledged they could just make it exclusive anyway didnât he?
The survival game from Blizzard was announced for PC and console according to blizzardâs official website page. My guess is that since PlayStation was never specifically mentioned, it will be Xbox/PC exclusive.
3 Likes
Not canceling a game, even if its near completion would imply that MS cares about paltry monetary gain that theyâd get from Playstation vs having whatâs likely going to be a very successful new IP exclusive and associated with Xbox
That isnât realistic, even if a Playstation version was completed and ready to go, if thereâs no platform announcement and obligation, MS would throw it in the trash.
Jez problem is the idea that MS should make all their multiplat games multiplat because itâll âgrow the fanbaseâ by that logic why not just go full on third party?
4 Likes
Blizzard next game can be exclusive as it is similar to Starfield announcement. Theyâre probably waiting for acquisition to make it a clear announcement as saying itâs exclusive will be too early and their answer will have to be related to acquisition that has yet to be completed.
It is not a terrible take at allâŚ
He is taking about games which could be released free to play and would require more players as possible
He does have a point here. But he is certainly not delusional.
3 Likes
Yup⌠That blizzards game is not coming out anytime soon
Atleast 2 years away I guess
Got it, so when is Halo Infinite coning to Switch and Playstation?
1 Like
It is the same as Megaton, the it turned to Exclusive, then an Banger. Basically all the phrases from the other era, GAF gets trickle down to media and fanboys and becomes mainstream. It happened during the Xbox One Gen and its happening now. We will have some more jargon in the future.
Haha⌠When was Halo ever on switch and PS?
It is very easy to trigger people here on very little of the things
2 Likes
I donât know about triggered but, Microsoft is âplaying niceâ more than enough with itâs other IPs that are multiplat. Really, like, whatâs the point of going through all this crap with ABK to level the playing field if youâre going to make even new IPs multiplatform? To continue to bolster your competitionâs platform - especially Sony, who has been doing dirty deals anti competitive practice for decades to push your 3rd place ecosystem out of the market for good?
New IPs should be exclusive. Titles with communities already attached should remain where they are. Just my opinion.
2 Likes
I for once never think Ms is playing nice. They just cream there strategy is such a way.
Putting free multi-player games on PS is not about doing gamers service but making sure there game gets more and more players so that they earn more money in the end.
Thatâs what Jez is trying to convey here.
2 Likes
MS and Sony dancing and fooling around regulators and medias about COD and yall still thinking about the necessity of the other IPs on other platforms because tHeY nEEd mOre prOfitZ anD aLL
And its a loser strategy, this past year MS has been touting competition and how Sony has a dominant market position
So in response MS should help fortify that position?
Because Im sure Sony will repay the favor and put their live service games on Xbox
4 Likes
It is just someoneâs opioinion from business perspective. It has its merits like I said. And demerits like you said.
Thatâs why I said it is easy to trigger people here.
No one has claimed that MS is doing what Jez said. The deal has not even gone through yet.
1 Like
If the survival game is heavy on microtransactions then I can see the incentives of Microsoft releasing it on PS5.
Remember folks, do not attack people. Keep the discussion about the actions or reactions. Do not make things personal.
8 Likes
Heâs not the first journalist to be wrong about something⌠especially something as complicated as acquisitions and mergers.
And he investigates stuff, just not this kind of stuff. Thereâs not many people that is knowledgeable AND can predict what will happen.
Every day thereâs some new informations that turn things around one way or the other. Itâs kind of a mess and hard to predict.
We shouldnât take anyoneâs analysis too seriously.
2 Likes