https://twitter.com/corybarlog/status/1588201544570195968?t=g0UDAl0_vj1QwH9Q4EJFeA&s=19
https://twitter.com/aarongreenberg/status/1588206501159927808?t=KcI7xxy4OiZHTBRhgqdgcQ&s=19
https://twitter.com/corybarlog/status/1588201544570195968?t=g0UDAl0_vj1QwH9Q4EJFeA&s=19
https://twitter.com/aarongreenberg/status/1588206501159927808?t=KcI7xxy4OiZHTBRhgqdgcQ&s=19
Just like I expected - betweenn 93-95
Nice, glad to see itâs been doing well, donât know if Iâll play it any time soon but Iâll look forward to it when I do.
AAA is mostly not gonna be the place to see games evolve and innovate. For the most part, we are tremendously stuck with similar design paradigms since the 2010s, just bigger and better in ways. Thatâs why indies and smaller scales games are important, integral, for innovation in games.
100% AAA are just like big hollywood movies - always safe approach. Too expensive to produce.
No interest in the game but I stopped taking reviews seriously long ago both for games and movies
I might check out a couple of reviewers thoughts here from time to time but thatâs about it
Most AAA have barely evolved from the 360 era, itâs all the same shit with better graphics
I think games are at least a bit better than what Disney has made of blockbuster movies
https://youtube.com/shorts/aq7cmEZEwKY?feature=share
Yeah it looks dammed good. Those details on Isaacâs suit too.
Well at least they have 2 diffferent genres - single player linear third person game and ubisoft third person game
It was a joke.
This might not be relevant anymore but I heard on a podcast that they could only discuss certain early parts of the game. Maybe thereâs something like that here, where reviewers couldnât talk about a later part of the game thatâs more of a departure?
Not really my type of game, but itâs cool to see another big game come out and score well for the people who are into it.
For those who still believe in Abandoned. Not sure who does still, but enough to actually have him answer.
I never believed in this game, but the real question is how did Sony get swindled into doing that featured article or whatever about it? And why did Geoff Keighley hype it up? Remember all the internet detectives that were convinced it was Kojima because âGeoffâs smirk gave it awayâ?
I think itâs the ultimate Aprilâs Fools from the dev.
I dont think Sony were really swindled
All they did was make a blog post and I believe thatâs something a dev/pub can pay for which is what BB likely did
and I think Geoff and others were just as curious as everyone else, PT, itâs cancellation and Kojima having a history of rusing people, I donât blame people for their wishful thinking
But it became pretty obvious fairly quickly that it was nonsense
Kojima- âGeoff you remember when we did that Moby Dick thingâ
Lol, never change Kojima
Thatâs exactly what he would say if he was involved and wanting to keep it secretâŚ
Another shitty action game where you slide towards your enemies , the camera is far too close, and godlike beings move slower and more clumsily than out of shape office workers. Bravo, Sony Santa Monica.
EDIT: Boom.
This just sounds bitter. They made what sounds like one of the best games of all time, donât need to be bitter to cope.