So I know Starfield has done well, it’s the least buggy Bethesda game ever, over 10 million players are playing and enjoying it and it will be supported for many years to come.
But as an Xbox console exclusive we simply can’t have something like that do well, we have nothing we can use to tear the game down and make Xbox players feel bad. That is not good for sony gamers as they need to feed off the mistakes of other consoles to make themselves feel better.
So with that I’ll say minesweeper is by far the better free game that comes with Windows and is probably played by more players over the world then Starfield. So sorry Starfueld but minesweeper is easily the better of the two.
Also if this poll does not pan out I’m going to keep picking games to compare Starfield to as I’m sure eventually another game will beat it and Sony fans will feel better about themselves. Cause how Sony fans feel is the MOST important thing in GAMING!!!
Indeed. I enjoyed playing Starfield for my hundred hours but it’s such a disappointment really it’s basically stuck in 2002. Minesweeper is definitely better.
So, now 150 hours into Starfield, I’ve found myself thinking, “man, I really wish I was just playing Minesweeper right now instead.” The things that bug me the most about Starfield I feel like Minesweeper got right. Of course, Starfield is much more vast, but I often feel like that’s almost to its own detriment.
Anyone who voted for Starfield is just a paid Xbot. Enjoy selling out!
Like really, finding mines is Starfield isn’t intuitive at all. You have to see them with your eyes and then blow them up. I rather the safe mine hunting in Starfield. I can’t believe they couldn’t get it right when Minecraft did it decades ago.
