Spartacus will have more subs right out of the gate because all ps plus subs will be turn into tier 1 spartacus subs so it will start with 48+
What Sony has to do is to convince a lot of those people to move to tier 2 and 3. We know that a lot of thosr now subs are from PC since ( I dont have evidence but bear with me!) The most played game in that service is Bloodborne (someone correct me if I’m wrong) so most likely a lot of those now pc players wont move to spartacus second tier.
PD: sorry for the amount of “subs” in this post
PD 2: what do you think of this armchar analysis? :px2
We really shouldn’t be counting tier 1 in the comparisons. The only people that will do that is Sony (for marketing) and fanboys on the internet trying to fight subscription wars.
The numbers comparisson will be between tier 2-3 and gamepass and as I said, most of tier 2 users are likely pc gamer who wont transition to this service.
Now SONY could convince some hardcore users but I think it wont be enough to top gamepass numbers in the coming years.
Yeah I’m pretty sure because PSnow flopped despite being out years before Gamepass. And PSnow has a much bigger library than Gamepass with tons of old PS2 and PS3 games.
The biggest thing for Spartacus will be Crunchyroll and Music subs. IS it going to be built in? That will help.
If the highest tier of this thing has Crunchyroll built in and some form of a Music app…that will be enticing.
Of course they will. And their fanboys will obviously fuel the narrative.
We’ll have to see what the service offers though. 16 bucks for a service with NO Pc equivalent(or an absolute shit one like PSnow) and no day 1 new games AAA games is a hard sell
Unless we get a huge ass library from PS1 PS2 PSP and Vita in Native form.
…
There are two major flaws in combining PS+ and PS Now.
In order to stream PS3 games requires Sony to have PS3 server blades. This is obsolete technology. They dont make these anymore. Any attempt to scale up the service will cause a bottle neck. It remains to be seen how Sony plans to solve this problem. This is the result of Sony not having a forward thinking strategy.
Licensing issues similar to Xbox Backwards Compatible licensing. Sony’s new service is basicly 20 ps1 games (the games that were cleared for PlayStation Classic), 50 ps2 games (the games cleared for PS4 back compatibility), and the PS3 games that are already available on PSNow.
One additional hurdle will actually be the contracts that exist for PS Now. Games stay on PS Now for a long never ending period of time. PlayStation clearly got favorable contracts for the service. Any game making the transition will want a better offer. And some games like Bethesda games will skip the new PlayStation service for obvious reasons.
Not sure if I’m being naive or uninformed or something here… But isn’t it possible Sony would shy away from this line of argument in order to keep this as a potential antitrust weakness for Microsoft?
Meaning, if Sony leans into the subscription numbers in this way, Microsoft can then point to Sony’s own marketing and say to regulators, “See, even if you define ‘market’ as being gaming subscription services, we’re still not the market leader.”
And it’s in Sony’s best interest to keep Microsoft in the regulator crosshairs, because it might help make Microsoft be a bit more acquisition shy.
Sorry, don’t mean to turn this into another acquisitions thread, but sometimes these things bleed into each other.
This is a good thought process but since Sony isn’t the company buying massive publishers, even if they say PS+ is the number one subscription service, I don’t think it would affect anything because compared to acquiring Activision Blizzard for about $70B, it’s basically well, nothing. lol.