How does it look to you, nice and clean? So no baggies and crisp?
I wonder if sheâs a legit source?
https://twitter.com/millieamand/status/1581967314152366080?s=20&t=mmToZ5CpOALFPFbvcf9IDg
https://twitter.com/millieamand/status/1581967317298077697?s=20&t=mmToZ5CpOALFPFbvcf9IDg
Wanted to post that just now. People canât seriously believe this to be true, right?
Plus, Grubb said he hasnât heard anything about a PS Show.
Who is this person anyway?
Occamâs Razor: Sony simply donât have anything to show.
I have legit no idea. But it got people now seriously thinking Sony has humongous third party exclusives planned, like GTA 6.
Isnât that the same person who talked about a mysterious 3rd party xbox exclusive a couple months ago? Does she have any credibility? To me it looks like sheâs another Serano.
There are people that believe that Sony will get time exclusivity for GTA6. And I am not joking.
Most likely at the same time the game releases worldwide.
Wouldnât that be midnight tonight? Wow if true.
Oh is that her?
Yeah, but some people just arenât the brightest of the bunch
Imagine its COD exclusive and Jim Ryan is too daft to realize Activision can just point that out to the courts
He calls it a blurry mess because of it. Innocence was 30fps on One X but it was fine, I didnât notice much blur, have seen much worse.
This whole idea of the CMA being influenced by a show case just seems super outlandish to me.
Imagine a regulatory body watching twitch in a conference room taking notes in order to decide on a 70 BN$ aquisition
The idea is not about the showcase itself, itâs about how Sony could announce exclusivity deals they acquired and MS would be able to use those as evidence against Sonyâs arguments regarding ABK. Would look real bad for Sony to complain while at the same time announcing a bunch of 3rd party exclusives they got
Itâs possible, but I doubt it. Knowing Sony they have some deals in place that theyâd love to reveal and maybe a first look at Spidey 2 if it is planned to drop next year?
I get that. I just believe itâs irrelevant. This wonât influence the desicion.
Regulatory bodies can request and subpoena any relevant data to acquisitions (at least I know the FTC can). Id imagine this type of info would be relevant. It would not matter if the information was public because it could always be redacted when shown to public.
Yeah I agree, I imagine they also require MS to disclose to them the console sales and subscription numbers.
Wish I still had a Switch to play